INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR NOLENSVILLE! GREYSTONE SHOPPING CENTER IS FOR SALE!
A ONCE-IN-A-TOWN'S LIFETIME OPPORTUNITY!
OUR GREYSTONE SHOPPING CENTER IS FOR SALE
FOR ONLY $4,700,000. DOLLARS. 39,100 SQUARE
FEET. PIGGLY WIGGLY IS GONE VACATING 18,500
SQUARE FEET. WHY NOT GET OUR NEW MAYOR
AND VICE-MAYOR TO BUY THE WHOLE SHOOTING
MATCH FOR THE TOWN??? VICE-MAYOR IS AN
ACTIVE REALTOR, TOWN COUNSEL IS EMPLOYEE
OF SOUTHERN LAND FOR TITLE, ETC...SO THE
TOWN HAS GOT IT MADE. LET'S GET CONTROL
OF IT COLLECT THE LEASE PAYMENTS AND
CONTROL OUR TOWN'S "OWN DESTINY"! WHY
NOT USE THE TOWN'S BUILT-IN REALTOR TALENT
AND GRAB THIS OPPORTUNITY...MAYBE EVEN
DRIVE THE PRICE DOWN SO TOWN CAN GET A
BARGAIN. HELLO...MAYOR...HELLO VICE-MAYOR
WAKE UP TIME TO DO SOMETHING WORTHWHILE
FOR THE ENTIRE TOWN. HOP TO IT BEFORE IT IS
TOO LATE. PS: THE VICE-MAYOR CAN DONATE THE
REALTOR FEE TO THE TOWN AS A PRICE REDUCTION.
"IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY OR WHAT????"
WAKE UP FOLKS SEND IN YOUR COMMENTS LET'S
GET THE BALL ROLLING NOW...SQUEEZE THE LEMON
AND WE WILL ALL STARTING DRINKING LEMONADE.
posted by Guest Writer at 7:45 PM
10 Comments:
Fantastic idea for the town...use all of the realtor talent that is already locked into the town hall inner workings! For once maybe...just maybe Dugger can get up and do something really of consequence for the future of our town. Pull some strings Mr. Puppetmeister...let's get it done now!
Long time local resident.
I'm not sure if the town investing in an overpriced shopping center which may or may not produce income is a wise move, or even whether Nolensville could qualify for an almost $5 million dollar mortgage, but I am positive there would be many who would oppose town funds being used to speculate on real estate instead of on necessities.
This is the site that always complains about the town spending money foolishly. Have you done an about face now? Or are you wishing the town leaders would entertain the idea in order to start a new controversy?
Hello 11:05 What controversy??? This town's leadership has YET..to collect one dime of "impact fees"? So from a financial point they need all the help they can get. Sad to say it but they don't have any money to spend on traffic lights, fire and police protection. Dugger stonewalled even supporting the fire dept. Learn the facts about our town's budget before you talk about controversy.
IF the "facts' are that "they don't have any money to spend on traffic lights, fire and police protection" as you say, how can buying an obviously cash poor property be a sound investment, even if it were legal for a town to do so?
Actually, I haven't seen or heard anything except on this site that says town does not have money enough for fire, police protection and traffic lights. Traffic lights can't just be bought and installed on state roads, no matter how much money the town has. It isn't that simple. Read the newspapers. Attend meetings and listen.
And at every BOMA meeting the police chief reports how many new cars, officers, uniforms and equipment they are grateful to the town for providing.
Hello 9:28PM...I sent an email to the blog to make sure one of their guest writers hadn't jumped in to answer your "lame" post. They said go for it. It is obvious you haven't attended any recent BOMA meetings or you would know the town budget at the end of 2006 showed some $54,ooo surplus and declining rapidly. Forget the strip mall there isn't anybody in town hall that knows how to turn a lemon into lemonade. TDOT SAYS a traffic light costs some $80,000 and if town pays for it they will install it. Yes you should attend a meeting now and then and you would recall our "famed" vice-mayor refusing to fund monies for the town hall and for the police dept. I appreciate the blog printing your nonsense. It shows everybody else just how "uninformed" most of our local voters are. Sincerely as very long local resident who is disappointed in our local elected officers. Listen UP!
Hello everybody...please correct by last 12:31 post...erase town hall and put in fire department. Remember that was the second meeting Dugger lost control. Thanx.
Corrections 12:21. We have only missed one BOMA in over a year, and only 2 planning, and have not read or heard that TDOT will install light if Nolensville buys it.
In fact, discussion was that TDOT states there is not enough traffic at Rocky Fork except at peak times, and not enough accidents to warrant a light. In fact Williamson AM ran a story on it. Charles Knapper was turned down at least 3 times by a Nolensville resident, Al Farhangi, who was in charge of that dept. at TDOT at the time. If a Nolensville resident in authority at TDOT, and 2 mayors keep being turned down, how can we expect anyone else at TDOT to be concerned enough to place our wants over the other 90 counties in Tn. crying out that they also want TDOT to address their growth needs?
There are several Nolensville accounts. I remember balance of well over a million quoted several times.
Dugger did not refuse to fund fire dept. He, and 3 other Aldermen asked repeatedly to postpone the vote Curtsinger demanded until further exploration of an alternative-a North Nolensville station, nearer to subdivisions and where firefighters live, to speed response time. He voted against adding on to present fire hall only, not against the fire dept.
If you are going to tell it, tell it like it really is-and how the record reflects.
Hello 11:19 gotta go out of town so I thought I would fire another shot over the bow of your sinking boat...it is obvious you voted for the present town hall full of totally inexperienced...non-professionals. So as 2007 moves on without the town having any means of charging impact fees per new law passed by state you will see the town's budget dwindle down to nothing. With Piggly Wiggly leaving the town will no longer get some 8 to $10,000 per month in sales tax. Get ready for some law suits from residents who didn't get adequate fire and police protection. As far as traffic congestion the town hasn't any solution whatsoever. Enjoy your lame excuses as to why the town cannot function as they should.
If they didn't like the proposal, why did they vote for it?
I'm afraid there is no argument about the firehall resolution, just more uneducated verbage.
I remember it was dugger and alexander who did not even fund the fire department in last years budget. Curtsinger and Felts were the two who held out until it was funded properly. And then the dugger and alexander would not fund a firehall expansion and tried to generate some cock and bull excuses so that simple minded people would think they could postpone it, even when they had weeks to consider it and asked no questions. We all know why that happened.
Post a Comment
<< Home